CASI Fourth Annual Conference

January 18, 2016

CASI Fourth Annual Conference 鈥淭he Eurasian Economic Union: political, economic and social aspects鈥�, October 31 鈥� November 1, 2015

Central Asian Studies Institute鈥檚 (CASI) fourth annual conference dedicated to the politics, economics and social dynamics of the Eurasian Economic Union took place at the 缅北强奸鈥檚 (缅北强奸) brand new campus on October 31 and November 1, 2015. Indeed the conference was planned to coincide with the official opening of the University鈥檚 new home, representing this institution鈥檚 role as the region鈥檚 hub for research and intellectual cooperation. This CASI conference was truly international, showcasing a variety of perspectives and approaches to the contentious issue at stake. Scholars from as far as Brazil and India presented their research at the conference along with colleagues from Armenia, Poland, Russia, Italy, Lithuania, Kazakhstan, Turkey and Kyrgyzstan.

The conference commenced following the opening remarks from the President of 缅北强奸 Andrew Wachtel, the Governor of the National Bank of Kyrgyzstan and an 缅北强奸 alumnus Tolkunbek Abdygulov and CASI Director, Svetlana Jacquesson. 听The panellists of the inaugurating section of the conference then presented an overview of the debates surrounding the Union, touching upon geopolitical imaginaries of the Eurasian 鈥榞reat space鈥� (Vadim Volovoi); the search for a mysterious 鈥楨urasian identity鈥� (Khachik Galtian); the international politics of Central Asian states balancing between two great powers 鈥� Russia and China 鈥� while attempting to preserve their 鈥榥ational interests鈥� (Fabio Indeo). Finally, Dina Iglikova concluded the first panel discussion with a theoretical exploration of a possibility for the development of a 鈥榮ecurity community鈥� 鈥� a region in which war becomes unlikely and even unthinkable - in Central Asia.

Day two of the conference elaborated on all these issues with some theoretically and empirically focused contributions.听 The second panel of the conference started with a retrospective look at other examples of regional integration, such as Zollverein, the German customs union formed in early 19^th century between Prussia and its neighbouring states (Gerald Pech). This historical approach was complemented by an analysis of state interests coming into competition with the interests of regional integration in the EEU, with some states still being clear winners while others remain largely at loss. Kairat Moldashev illustrated this dynamic with an image 鈥� borrowed from a famous fable by Krilov - of a swan, a crab and a pike all harnessed into the same carriage, while pulling in opposing directions.

The following panel looked at wider regional implications of the EEU, examining the roles of India (and by extension, South Asia) and Turkey (representing the 鈥楾urkic world鈥�).听 The concluding two panels of the conference looked at concrete aspects of the Eurasian integration, giving assessment to the economic effects and perspectives for development of Central Asian states and Kyrgyzstan in particular.

All sessions were followed by (at times heated) discussions among the conference participants and the audience revealing the controversial and deeply political nature of the processes taking place in the Eurasian space. 听Overall, the conference confirmed that how one sees the EUU largely depends on where they stand 鈥� both geographically, politically and theoretically.

<< go to news list